BATTLESTAR
 

GALACTICA

 
BLOG
 
About the Blog

Whatever I feel like writing about Battlestar Galactica, the classic TV series from 1978 starring Richard Hatch, Dirk Benedict, and Lorne Greene, I write it here.

To contact me, please Email

Buy the DVDs

In order to follow this blog, you need to own the original classic series on DVD:

You may also want to buy the new series on DVD:

New Battlestar Galactica - Miniseries
New Battlestar Galactica - Season One
New Battlestar Galactica - Season Two

Galactica Directory
Visit the Battlestar Galactica Directory for links to other Battlestar Galactica websites.
Other Galactica Sites
Sheba's Galaxy
Other Blogs
Half Sigma
Calico Cat
Contrarian Investing Blog
Gold and Silver Blog
Miscellaneous Links
JDate reviews
Jewish Dating
Jewish dating reviews
Kate Spade Handbags
Online Dating
Persian Rugs
Urban Living
Blog Archives
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
March 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
June 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007

Sunday, July 18, 2004

Microsoft Project Server and Battlestar Galactica

I was reading through the documentation for Microsoft Project Server this week, and I came across one of its amazing abilities. You can assign placeholder resources (in the world of project management, people are dehumanized and called “resources”) to your project, and then Microsoft Project Server will automatically scan through the available unassigned resources in the central resource pool and assign people to your project.

I wondered what kind of organization would be dumb enough to let a computer program assign people to important projects. Then it occurred to me that 26 years ago, back in 1978, Commander Adama did exactly that in the episode “Gun on Ice Planet Zero.”

Adama needed a team to go down to an ice planet to blow up a huge gun. It was never clear why a squadron of Vipers couldn’t destroy it, nor why the fleet couldn’t just zoom past the planet while the gun was on the other side, but that’s stuff for another post in the future.

Adama ordered Colonel Tigh to have the computer select the personnel for the mission. And the computer picked all criminals who were serving sentences on the prison barge. It was never clear why the fleet was carrying prisoners on a prison barge when there were so many more deserving who were left behind, but that’s also stuff for another post in the future.

Starbuck told Adama that there must be a mistake, but Adama insisted that they go ahead with the personnel selected by the computer, without giving the order any thought at all. Of course, the internal bickering among the prisoners once down on the planet almost caused the mission to fail. How could they be so stupid as to entrust the safety of everyone in the fleet to a group of convicts? Wasn’t there anyone else in the fleet capable of doing the mission? Even if they were slightly less skilled than the convicts, surely for the sake of team unity wouldn't it have been more prudent to leave the prisoners on the prison barge?

First of all, it is clear that Adama, who is usually a wise leader, messed up big time here. He shouldn’t have allowed the mission to be fielded entirely by convicts. He must have been so awed by the power of the computer that he let it override his common sense. Starbuck had a lot more sense than Adama.

How could the computer have made such dumb choices for the mission? I have three theories:

(1) When Starbuck reprogrammed the computer to include himself in the team, he messed something up, and caused the computer program to select incredibly dumb choices.

(2) No one told the computer that this mission took priority over other activities. The computer searched all the personnel in the fleet, and found that the only people not currently assigned to other tasks were people in the prison barge. Maybe Starbuck’s meddling had something to do with this?

(3) Perhaps the guys on the prison barge really did have the most experience in the areas of expertise required for the mission, but the computer’s artificial intelligence just wasn’t smart enough to realize it was a bad idea to select convicts for an important mission.

I think this episode was really intended to be a warning for people living in the future when computers would be able to select “resources” for a project. It was supposed to show us the limitations of computers. Any computer smart enough to pick personnel for a mission is too dangerous to exist. This is what happened to the original Cylon race. They made their machines too smart, and the machines took over.


Comments:
This post has been removed by a blog administrator.
 
Ostensibly the prison barge was filled subsequent to the departure from the colonies, as known criminals were discovered and other people committed criminal acts.
 
iplayalto- logically, shouldn't they fill the prison barge with non prisoners, therefore using up all the available space, and not leaving any space for criminals?
 
From what I remember from reading the book, the convicts selected were all experts in demolitions missions on in ice/mountainous environments(I think they were engaged in some sort of anti-Cylon terrorist activity)

The planet's environment was supposed to be so harsh that it was unlikely that anyway else would make it to the gun emplacement safely. I think expendability was factored into the computer's selection process as well.
 
I have a couple points to make,
1)I think the prison barge was already full of the prisoners when the Cylon fleet made thier attack and therefore Adama had basically two choices, jettison all the prisoners out the airlock to make more room for civilians, or bring them along for the ride. While you may at first think, well heck jettison them, how would you like to be the low level criminal or protestor that happened to be on that transport that day.
2) Expendability is definetly a factor, and I suppose if you had a few solider in place to act as "prison guards" sending the cannon fauter forwadr for a risky assignment isn't nesscesarily the worst idea.
3) This one is a little tougher to define, but if the situation were real, and the prisoners were told, hey see that gun there blow it up and we all live, fail and we all die... One would think that the self-preservation of even a criminal would have some ranking in thier thoughts. If you threw in a bonus of better rations, or some other sort of reward for the prisoners that survived it might also help to improve the odds of success.
4) When looking at the concept of projet management, if the skills of a "resource" could be catagorized and rated teh skills required for a task culd be sufficiently outlined then teh process of matching them up is ratehr simple. I propose the fault is not in the concept of an AI that allocates resources, but in the human who defines the resources that exist, and the resources needed for a project.
 
Post a Comment